Automated home 2.0 – #43 low Energy, Airtightness, Budgets, & compromise

From the outset we knew we wanted our new home to have lower running costs than the old one. as well as the apparent financial advantages, there is an environmental imperative for us all to use less energy too.

There are numerous standards and buzz words surrounding this area, Zero Energy, low Energy, Zero Carbon and Carbon Neutral for example. A new standard that’s taking off in this part of the world (it’s already a requirement in the Republic of Ireland), is ‘nearly Zero energy Buildings’ or nZEB.

But Passivhaus (Passive House) was the one we knew many about and it seems to be well recognised when you are talking about the specifications for a new self-build. However, numerous companies we talked to, including window producers and energy consultants, cautioned us on the idea of going for a fully certified Passive house build.

This wasn’t because they thought a Passive house is a bad idea, on the contrary, but the phrase ‘diminishing returns’ was often quoted, while pretty much everyone widely agreed that we ought to still try to adopt the main principals for our own build.

Passive Principles

So let’s look at those principles. Here’s a slide from a talk I attended showing the 5 main principals of Passive House.

Very High Levels of InsulationPassive houses are very insulated.

Thermal Bridge totally free ConstructionTheir design and building methods eradicate junctions where a conventional building conducts heat away.

High performance Windows / FramesPassive house windows are triple glazed and the frames and fittings are all made for an ultra-low U value. In addition passive houses take advantage of solar acquire using south facing windows.

Airtight building FabricThese houses are airtight, eliminating the conventional ‘drafty’ buildings of old. A passive house should not leak much more air than 0.6 times the total house volume per hour.

Mechanical Ventilation System with heat RecoveryBecause these homes are air tight they need mechanical ventilation. These systems expel the stale air and moisture, replacing it with fresh air. This process happens across a heat exchanger so up to 85% of the heat is retained.

Design

While it’s possible to build a fully certified passive home in the style we wanted, it is much more challenging and certainly much more expensive.

As an example, one builder we spoke with that had just completed a certified passive house told us certain design elements (like dormer windows) were much harder and much more time consuming to build and thus much more expensive to achieve in a certified Passive House. While we want low heating costs for the new Automated home 2.0, we didn’t want that to be at the expense of our design and other features.

Masonry Construction

The 2 main passive house projects that I followed online (Ben Adam-Smith and Portree Passivhaus) had both gone for masonry construction.

Our last house had stud walls upstairs and a wood first floor which we always regretted as both were very noisy. So best from day one our wish list had been set out for solid walls and floors and we also spec’d concrete stairs to be sure of no squeaks or creaks there either.

That sound issue did colour our opinion on building wood frame too. Although having seen a beautiful wood frame home, recently built by a close family member, I’m sure that we could have been pleased with one too.

Carbon for Build

Not going TF also implied having much much more concrete in our build. There are massive amounts of embodied energy in many building materials – like steel and glass for example, although this will improve over time as much more of our electrical power comes from renewable sources. Concrete uses a chemical reaction called “calcination” that takes place during the process of making ‘clinker’, a important part of concrete, that splits the material into calcium oxide and CO2 (here’s a good short article from the BBC on concrete production). new methods are appearing that are improving the CO2 emissions for concrete production so things ought to improve here too in the future.

Interestingly the passive standard has absolutely nothing to say on the subject of decreasing the carbon during construction. Its only issue is creating a building that won’t require much energy once built.

We used a fabric first method and our block build, plus stone wall, tiled floor and overhang in the barn helps to soak up heat from the winter season sun and release it back into the house. We’re also running the heat pump much more at night on our less expensive economy 7 electrical power tariff and this is all working well. We got a 1.9 airtightness test rating in the end and our heat Pump and MVHR are working well together to offer a very comfortable environment. I’m recording data for the year and ought to have an update sometime in January on our energy usage for 12 months.

Budgets & Compromise

As with so much in lifeDisse beslutninger var en tightrope walk mellem de konkurrerende krav om at opretholde vores valgte design, vores krav til en lav energibygning og vores endelige budget.

Nogle af vores valg er kommet ned til payback tid. Hvis omkostningerne ved at gå fra dobbelt til tredobbelte glaserede vinduer vil tage, siger 15 år at genvinde gennem lidt lavere opvarmningsregninger, så ville du vælge det? Hvis det er 30 år i stedet så hvad med nu? Det punkt, hvor disse ting giver mening, vil variere for individet. At sige, at jeg tror, ​​at det vigtigste kompromis i hele vores projekt har været vores vinduer og skal træne for termoruder i stedet for tredobbelt.

Vi ønsker også et Solar PV-system, men det bliver nødt til at vente. Det er en skam, at der er nul incitamenter i Nordirland for varmepumper eller Solar PV osv. Jeg tror, ​​vi er den eneste del af Storbritannien og Irland, ikke at have nogen. Eventuelt vil den nye energiteknik til ni, der kommer senere i år, ændre det.

Da disse bygningsmetoder og produkter bliver meget mere almindelige her, vil priserne falde. Hvis vi begyndte igen om morgenen, er jeg temmelig sikker på, at vi ville gå endnu mere mod den passive standard, end vi har gjort.

Efter at have boet i huset i meget mere end et år nu er vi meget glade for, at vores beslutning ikke at brænde noget var den bedste.

Lav energi?

[Opdatering – Her er tallene for vores første år løbende omkostninger]

Lav energi? Eco House? Disse vilkår er ikke veldefinerede. Men vi har et hjem, som i det mindste er rigtig godt isoleret, udnytter solen Acquire om vinteren, bruger et intelligent bygningsstyringssystem, kører kun på elektricitet, har en god termisk masse og i sidste ende stor komfort og luftkvalitet niveauer hele året rundt.

Næste gang

Næste gang vil vi se på nogle af den nye teknologi i det automatiserede hjem. I mellemtiden husk at tjekke vores Instagram for at følge projektet, læs resten af ​​de automatiserede Hjem 2.0 blog-beskeder og find linkene til alle de produkter, vi har brugt i vores selvbyggede.

Del dette:
Facebook.
Twitter.
Reddit.
Linkedin.
Pinterest13.
Email.
Mere

Whatsapp.
Print

Skype.
Tumblr.

Telegram
Lomme

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Extra Text
Cape Town, South Africa